|
Chattooga Watershed Restoration Project
County Schools Funding Revitalization
Act of 1999
Georgia DNR Bureaucrats Overstep Their Authority
Biodiversity and Funding: The 106th Congress
Chattooga
Watershed Restoration Project
The US Forest Service recently decided to implement a large scale watershed
restoration project in the Chattooga River watershed. The first year’s funding
for the project will be a whopping $2.1 million, with a projected project duration
of up to five years. The Forest Service’s list of "potential collaborators"
includes three state governments, four county governments, three national forests,
two Forest Service Research Stations, numerous special interest groups, and
just one conservation-advocacy organization: the Chattooga River Watershed Coalition.
The project’s stated intent is to "build upon the body of research and the
relationships developed through the Forest Service’s Chattooga River Watershed
Ecosystem Management Demonstration Project conducted in 1993-1995," with a focus
on "sediment reduction and alleviating excess fecal coliform concentrations."
Our analysis of the Restoration Project’s fledgling Business Plan clearly indicates
that strong third party participation and oversight is needed. It seems that
considerable funds are earmarked for projects that are quite removed from "watershed
restoration;" for example, activities aimed exclusively at timber management,
and creating artificial habitats for game species. Instead, we advocate direct
funding to projects for remedying urgent water quality problems, such as cleaning
up Stekoa Creek. The CRWC will participate in and closely follow the implementation
of the Restoration Project, which begins initial organization and coordination
this January.
County
Schools Funding Revitalization Act of 1999
Representative Nathan Deal of Georgia has introduced some startling legislation
(HR 2389) called the County Schools Funding Revitalization Act of 1999. The
proposed Act addresses the federal funding given to counties from timber sales
where public lands are located, which is known as the 25% Fund. This fund has
dwindled, because the volume of timber sales has been reduced or stopped altogether
in many areas due to past over-harvesting, and litigation. Now, this bill would
undermine the ability of Forest Service Chief Michael Dombeck to redirect his
agency toward responsible land management. Dombeck has strongly endorsed decoupling
county payments and timber receipts, because he knows that the current system
produces the incentives for logging at the expense of other important values
such as clean water, recreation, fish and wildlife. Furthermore, the Deal bill
is premised on the idea that our national forests need more logging. The bill
increases federal subsidies for logging by at least $90 million annually and
$630 million over the next seven years. Yet the Forest Service’s timber program
loses millions of dollars of taxpayer’s money, and results in enormous environmental
costs as well. The bill also contains provisions to transfer a measure of control
of our national forest to a few select, local authorities who would have the
means to fashion projects to keep the cash flowing. Certainly, this could further
the likelihood of increased resource extraction at the expense of the other
values found on our public lands. Currently, the bill has passed the House
and is headed to the Senate. Please contact your Senators and express your opinion
about this bill. Members of Congress should understand that excessive logging
is the problem, not the solution.
Georgia
DNR Bureaucrats Overstep Their Authority
On December 16, without public input, knowledge or consulting the DNR Board,
DNR Commissioner Lonice Barrett and Division of Wildlife Chief David Waller
signed an official policy statement opposing the creation of additional wilderness
areas in the Chattahoochee National Forest. This position runs counter to the
wishes of thousands of Georgians, who see wilderness designation as a way to
protect their drinking water supplies and other natural resources. It also fails
to recognize that wilderness areas are open to traditional uses such as hunting
and fishing, and this special designation is supported by organizations such
as the Georgia Wildlife Federation. We urge citizens to express their views
to Governor Barnes. After all, only 15% of the 750,000 acre Chattahoochee National
Forest is currently protected as wilderness, and the Forest Service’s draft
proposal would add to that figure only 34,000 acres, leaving more 600,000 acres
open to logging and possible wildlife management.
Biodiversity
and Funding: The 106th Congress
The outcome of the first session of the 106th Congress for biodiversity
could be summarized as a few steps forward and no major steps back. Regular
funding for the major conservation agencies showed some increases for Fiscal
Year 2000 over FY ‘99, as shown below:
National Park Service: $1.8 billion, up from $1.7 billion
Fish and Wildlife Service: $878 million, up from $802 million
Bureau of Land Management: $1.2 billion, up from $1.1 billion
Funding for the Forest Service dropped by $29 million overall, in areas both
harmful and helpful to biodiversity. While certain fisheries programs got increases
and money to reconstruct degraded roads was increased, so was money to construct
new logging roads, as well as increase in logging in Alaska and clearcutting
in Colorado. Also, over all funding for the timber program will remain the same
as last year.
Funding for lands for habitat protection increased: The President’s Land Legacy
Initiative was funded at $651 million, including $444 million for federal land
acquisition and $206 million for state and local governments.
The Land & Water Conservation Fund allocations were increased this year
to $450 million, and progress has been made toward a permanent funding mechanism
via a compromise bill that combines the bill introduced by the late Rep. George
Miller’s pro-conservation HR798 and Rep. Don Young’s anti-conservation HR701.
The new compromise bill could pass this year.
Back to the Top
|